You claim to have the evidence. Well its time you put up. Science has over 240,000 peer-reviewed articles supporting evolution. Surely one of your arguments could pass. And don't posit conspiracy, claiming all scientists are god hating atheists as we all know science is a religiously diverse group.
Why Answers Research Journal does not count as a valid peer-reviewed journal. In their own words they admit they are a biased publication, and therefore, they lack subjectivity and credibility. Here are their own words:
The following criteria will be used in judging papers: 1. Is the papers topic important to the development of the Creation and Flood model?... 3. Is this paper formulated within a young-earth, young-universe framework? 4. If the paper discusses claimed evidence for an old earth and/or universe, does this paper offer a very constructively positive criticism and provide a possible young-earth, young-universe alternative?... The editor-in-chief will not be afraid to reject a paper if it does not properly satisfy the above criteria or it conflicts with the best interests of AiG as judged by its biblical stand and goals outlined in its statement of faith.
And remember to always, Think about it.